For Bill and Brian

Here is a thoughtful application of theology to current events as discussed over at the Volokh conspiracy.

Would Martin Luther advocate turning the other cheek?

OR

Would Martin Luther cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war?

2 Comments
Brian B said:

Not being a Lutheran, nor well versed in his theology beyond the broader break with the RCC, I haven’t a clue what Luther would advocate.



Bill said:

Okay, being a member of the ELCA, I suppose I would be looked on to provide light in this discussion. Considering I would be seen as a heritic from the get-go, take my opinions with a grain of salt.

First of all, Martin Luther is closer to modern day Fundamentalist Christians than to the ELCA. He might recognize the Wisconsin Synod. Second, Martin Luther would probably come down on the side of the government regardless. BUT, that assumes he would even take a stance on a political issue.

Today’s pastors, Episcopallian, Lutheran, or other are highly prone to open their mouths where they have no business doing so. I wrote extensively a month ago on the subject of church and state. Quoting Marting Luther simply adds fuel to MY fire, and provides no clarity in the discussion at hand.

For myself, I am a firm believer in carry, whether open or concealed. I don’t use any religiousl doctrine to support my position. It has nothing to do with God and me, and everything to do with me and the guy over there.



    About Naked Villainy

    • maxldr

    Villainous
    Contacts

    • E-mail your villainous leader:
      "maxldr-blog"-at-yahoo-dot-com or
      "maximumleader"-at-nakedvillainy-dot-com

    • Follow us on Twitter:
      at-maximumleader

    • No really follow on
      Twitter. I tweet a lot.

Your abject misery is my first priority.

    Villainous Commerce

    Villainous Sponsors

      • Get your link here.

      Villainous Search